Talk:Mongolian Social Democratic Party

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mongols Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling

An anonymous person left a comment that the

Mongolian spelling for the word New is wrong. Instead of "Shinz" it should be "Shine".

Can anyone confirm this? The party website seems to be down at the moment. aliceinlampyland 14:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

I confirm the word "Shine" is correct (I am fluent in Mongolian) Lemonhead 16:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Please edit the header to Mongolian Social Democratic Party

"Mongolian Social Democratic Party" united with "Mongolian Democratic Party" and the merger party is called as Democratic Party of Mongolia. It was the part of the Motherland - Democracy Coalition and have total 34 seats at the Mongolian Parliament.

Mongolian New Socialist Democratic Party does not have any seat at the Parliament. It is a new small party. It has similar policy with ex-communist party Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party. i.e. Mongolian Social Democratic Party and Mongolian New Socialist Democratic Party are contradictory parties. Lemonhead 16:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

1990 or 2004? MSDP or DP? SI or IDU?

While the article says that the MSDP was founded in 1990, the only source given states that the MSDP was founded in 2004. Wich one is correct?. Also, if the MSDP merged into the Democratic Party (DP) in 2000, how could it present itself to the 2012 elections? And finally, if the MSDP is still member of the Socialist International and its still member of the DP, how could be this last one member of the IDU?. Too many contradictions in this article...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still looking for better sourcing, but Encyclopedia Britannica claims that MSDP merely formed an alliance with the MNDP and other parties, creating the Democratic Alliance prior to the 1996 elections. Nations Encyclopedia confirms this, though names the alliance the Democratic Union Coalition. Both sources agree that this coalition/alliance won 50 of 76 seats in that election. Both sources also agree that the coalition split prior to the July 2000 elections, with NE explicitly stating that the MSDP left the coalition at that time. Neither source appears to be able to reconcile InfoMongolia's claim of the MSDP being founded in 2004. Regarding the IDU/Socialist International claim, I don't see anything about that in either of the encyclopedia articles, but I am not seeing that we are, or even were, making such a claim in our article. CThomas³ (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mongolian Social Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610065358/http://msdp.mn/ to http://www.msdp.mn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]